Skip To Content
Article

Q&A: Penalty-Free Resignation Date

Question & Answer illustration

Editor's note: This article has been updated to reflect new provisions passed in the 89th Texas Legislature Regular Session.

House Bill (HB) 2 of the 89th Texas Regular Legislature Session addressed areas of the rights of public school educators adding “good cause” reasons for resignation after the penalty-free resignation date (PFRD) which could impact district decision-making when contract abandonment occurs.

This Q&A is written to address some of the most common questions HR Services continues to receive.

Q: Has the PFRD changed?

A: The PFRD has not changed. It is still 45 days before the first day of instruction. The actions the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) can take against an educator who resigns between the 44th and 30th day prior to the first day of instruction without good cause were amended in 2023 as an available action. Prior to 2023, an educator’s certificate could be suspended for contract abandonment. Although suspension is no longer an available action, SBEC may still take other disciplinary action such as an inscribed reprimand. 

Q: How do I determine the first day of instruction?

A: The first day of instruction varies from school district to school district. It is the first day of school for students in your school district.

Q: Are the 45 days business days or calendar days?

A: The 45 days are calendar days. If the 45th day falls on a weekend or a holiday, for the employee’s benefit, the best practice would be to set the PFRD forward on the next business day. For example, if the PFRD is on Saturday, the district should move it to the following Monday so the actual day the resignation is submitted is a business day. 

Q: What is considered “good cause” for resigning a contract without permission?

A: HB 2 amended Texas Education Code (TEC) adding the following as reasons SBEC may not impose a sanction for contract abandonment against a teacher if they did not properly resign under TEC § 21.105, § 21.160, or § 21.210.

  • The teacher or a close family member has a serious illness or health condition as evidenced by documentation from a licensed medical provider.
  • The teacher must relocate to a new city because of a change in employment of the educator’s spouse or partner who resides with the educator as supported by documentation.
  • A significant change in the needs of the teacher’s family requires the educator to relocate or forgo employment.
  • The teacher has reasonable belief they had written permission from the school district administration to resign.

Q: What is a mitigating factor that shall be considered by SBEC when determining a violation of contract abandonment by an educator?

A: Title 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) § 249.17(d)(2) (updated May 2025) has a list of mitigating factors they may take into consideration when determining a disciplinary decision for an educator who has abandoned a contract.

  • The educator gave at least a 30-day written notice in advance of the first day of instruction that the educator will not be present.
  • The educator assisted the school district in finding a replacement to fill the position, as well as continued to work with the school district to hire and train the replacement educator.
  • The educator showed good faith in communication and negotiations with the school district.
  • The educator provided lesson plans following resignation.
  • The educator changed careers within the field of education:
    • to a position that required a different class of educator certification as defined in 19 TAC §230.33(b);
    • to a position with a higher level of authority within the principal class of certificate; or
    • to a position in an open-enrollment charter school or a district of innovation that is equivalent to the position described above.
  • The educator had a reduction in base pay, excluding stipends, as compared to the educator's base pay for the prior year at the same school district.
  • The educator resigned due to working conditions that reasonably posed an immediate threat of significant physical harm to the educator.
  • Any other relevant circumstances or facts.

Resources

HRX articles written on this topic include:

Was this article helpful?
Jennifer Barton
Jennifer Barton
HR Services Assistant Director

Jennifer Barton joined HR Services in 2018. She supervises a team of consultants providing staffing reviews, HR consulting, and employee opinion surveys for Texas school districts. In addition to overseeing and conducting consulting projects, Barton provides training and guidance to district leaders and assists with resource planning and development for HR Services. 

Barton earned master’s degrees in education and educational leadership from The University of Texas at Austin and Lamar University. She holds a Texas superintendent certificate and is a SHRM-CP.

Karen Dooley
Karen Dooley
Senior HR Consultant

Karen Dooley joined HR Services in 2016. She specializes in staffing services, HR reviews, and other projects. She provides training and assists school districts with their HR-related needs. Dooley is a seasoned administrator with more than 17 years of HR experience in Central Texas districts as a coordinator, director, and assistant superintendent. She also worked as an assistant principal, counselor, and teacher, and holds a superintendent certificate.

Dooley received her master’s degree from Prairie View A&M University and her bachelor’s degree from Texas State University.

HR Services

TASB HR Services supports HR leadership in Texas schools through membership offerings in specialized training, consulting, and other services.
HRX Logo

Subscribe to HRX

Stay up to date with all the latest HR news and trends by joining the HRX mailing list!